initial checkin

dietlibc-0.31-defpath.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+diff -up dietlibc-0.31/include/paths.h.~1~ dietlibc-0.31/include/paths.h
+--- dietlibc-0.31/include/paths.h.defpath
++++ dietlibc-0.31/include/paths.h
+@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
+ #define _PATHS_H
+ 
+ #define _PATH_BSHELL "/bin/sh"
+-#define _PATH_DEFPATH "/bin:/usr/bin:"
++#define _PATH_DEFPATH "/bin:/usr/bin"
+ 
+ #define _PATH_DEVNULL "/dev/null"
+ 

dietlibc-0.31-stacksmash-dyn.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+diff -up dietlibc-0.31/lib/stack_smash_handler2.c.~1~ dietlibc-0.31/lib/stack_smash_handler2.c
+--- dietlibc-0.31/lib/stack_smash_handler2.c.~1~	2007-09-01 14:13:21.000000000 +0200
++++ dietlibc-0.31/lib/stack_smash_handler2.c	2007-09-01 14:13:40.000000000 +0200
+@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
+ #include <write12.h>
+ 
+ void __stack_chk_fail(void);
++void __stack_chk_fail_local(void) __attribute__((__alias__("__stack_chk_fail")));
+ 
+ /* earlier versions of ProPolice actually gave the address and function
+  * name as arguments to the handler, so it could print some useful

dietlibc-0.31-stacksmash.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+2007-09-01  Enrico Scholz  <enrico.scholz@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>
+	* lib/stack_smash_handler2: modified __stack_chk_fail() to trigger
+	a segfault by accessing address 0x0. Every system with an MMU
+	known by me, segfaults by dereferencing a NULL pointer
+
+	* Makefile: added hack to compile stack_smash_handler2 with
+	'--fno-omit-frame-pointer'.
+
+diff -up dietlibc-0.31/lib/stack_smash_handler2.c.~1~ dietlibc-0.31/lib/stack_smash_handler2.c
+--- dietlibc-0.31/lib/stack_smash_handler2.c.stacksmash
++++ dietlibc-0.31/lib/stack_smash_handler2.c
+@@ -8,5 +8,13 @@ void __stack_chk_fail(void);
+  * diagnostics.  No more. :-( */
+ void __stack_chk_fail(void) {
+   __write2("smashed stack detected, program terminated.\n");
+-  _exit(127);
++
++  /* trigger a segfault which can be inspected within a debugger (inclusive
++   * stack-trace). 'abort(3)' at this place would be too heavy weighted.
++   *
++   * TODO: limit this to systems which are known to have an MMU (resp. is
++   * dietlibc with stack-protector used on systems without an MMU?)
++   */
++  while (1)
++	  *(char *)0 = 0;
+ }
+--- dietlibc-0.31/Makefile.stacksmash
++++ dietlibc-0.31/Makefile
+@@ -172,9 +172,10 @@ $(OBJDIR)/%.o: %.S $(ARCH)/syscalls.h
+ $(OBJDIR)/pthread_%.o: libpthread/pthread_%.c
+ 	$(CROSS)$(CC) $(INC) $(CFLAGS) -c $< -o $@
+ 	$(COMMENT) -$(CROSS)strip -x -R .comment -R .note $@
++$(OBJDIR)/stack_smash_handler2.o:	XCFLAGS:=-fno-omit-frame-pointer
+ 
+ $(OBJDIR)/%.o: %.c
+-	$(CROSS)$(CC) $(INC) $(CFLAGS) -c $< -o $@ -D__dietlibc__
++	$(CROSS)$(CC) $(INC) $(CFLAGS) $(XCFLAGS) -c $< -o $@ -D__dietlibc__
+ 	$(COMMENT) -$(CROSS)strip -x -R .comment -R .note $@
+ endif
+ 

lastver

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+0.31

verinfo

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/dietlibc/
+dietlibc-(.*?).tar.bz2