rpms/ruby
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

The no-library-dependency* are not reported on Fedora anymore.

Browse source 
These check was disabled on Fedora in rpmlint-2.2.0-2.fc35, because the
-devel package already depends on the autogenerated `libruby.so.3.1()(64bit)`

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037402
This commit is contained in:
Vít Ondruch 2022-01-10 15:22:18 +01:00
commit bd7ff394ca
1 changed files with 0 additions and 12 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12
ruby.rpmlintrc
View file

@ -41,18 +41,6 @@ addFilter(r'^ruby-libs\.\w+: W: library-not-linked-against-libc /usr/lib(64)?/ru
# Rake ships some examples.
addFilter(r'^rubygem-rake.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/gems/gems/rake-[\d\.]+/doc/example/\w+.c$')
# The -devel package depends on package containing libruby.so.x.y. That should
# be enough:
# ~~~
# $ rpm -qpR /var/lib/mock/ruby/result/ruby-devel-3.1.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm | grep libruby
# libruby.so.3.1()(64bit)
# ~~~
# https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/issues/781
#
# Unfortunately, this filter triggers another error:
# https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/issues/782
addFilter(r'^ruby-devel\.\w+: E: no-library-dependency-(for|on ruby-libs) /usr/lib(64)?/libruby.so.\d.\d.0$')
# Some executables don't have their manual pages. Is it worth of use help2man?
addFilter(r'^.+: W: no-manual-page-for-binary (bundler|gem|rbs|rdbg|rdoc|ruby-mri|typeprof)$')