Compare commits
No commits in common. "rawhide" and "f41" have entirely different histories.
6 changed files with 9 additions and 693 deletions
|
|
@ -1,429 +0,0 @@
|
|||
From f8b49348d02d0220e20391665f7418f9212dac02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: Jon Rowe <hello@jonrowe.co.uk>
|
||||
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 21:39:26 +0100
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] Relax specs for Ruby 3.4 hash formatting
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
.../matching_arguments.feature | 6 +-
|
||||
.../step_definitions/additional_cli_steps.rb | 7 +-
|
||||
spec/rspec/mocks/argument_matchers_spec.rb | 14 ++--
|
||||
spec/rspec/mocks/diffing_spec.rb | 84 ++++++++++++-------
|
||||
spec/rspec/mocks/double_spec.rb | 9 +-
|
||||
.../mocks/hash_excluding_matcher_spec.rb | 9 +-
|
||||
.../mocks/hash_including_matcher_spec.rb | 9 +-
|
||||
spec/rspec/mocks/matchers/receive_spec.rb | 26 ++++--
|
||||
.../expected_arg_verification_spec.rb | 11 ++-
|
||||
9 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/features/setting_constraints/matching_arguments.feature b/features/setting_constraints/matching_arguments.feature
|
||||
index caea74248..cad5cea4c 100644
|
||||
--- a/features/setting_constraints/matching_arguments.feature
|
||||
+++ b/features/setting_constraints/matching_arguments.feature
|
||||
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ Feature: Matching arguments
|
||||
end
|
||||
"""
|
||||
When I run `rspec keyword_example_spec.rb`
|
||||
- Then it should fail with the following output:
|
||||
+ Then it should fail with the following output, ignoring hash syntax:
|
||||
| 2 examples, 1 failure |
|
||||
| |
|
||||
| Failure/Error: dbl.foo(bar: "incorrect") |
|
||||
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ Feature: Matching arguments
|
||||
end
|
||||
"""
|
||||
When I run `rspec keyword_example_spec.rb`
|
||||
- Then it should fail with the following output:
|
||||
+ Then it should fail with the following output, ignoring hash syntax:
|
||||
| 1 example, 1 failure |
|
||||
| |
|
||||
| Failure/Error: dbl.foo({bar: "also incorrect"}) |
|
||||
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ Feature: Matching arguments
|
||||
end
|
||||
"""
|
||||
When I run `rspec rspec_satisfy_spec.rb`
|
||||
- Then it should fail with the following output:
|
||||
+ Then it should fail with the following output, ignoring hash syntax:
|
||||
| 2 examples, 1 failure |
|
||||
| |
|
||||
| Failure/Error: dbl.foo({ :a => { :b => { :c => 3 } } }) |
|
||||
diff --git a/features/step_definitions/additional_cli_steps.rb b/features/step_definitions/additional_cli_steps.rb
|
||||
index 77f8c0f30..acf1117e0 100644
|
||||
--- a/features/step_definitions/additional_cli_steps.rb
|
||||
+++ b/features/step_definitions/additional_cli_steps.rb
|
||||
@@ -22,8 +22,13 @@
|
||||
diffable
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
-Then /^it should fail with the following output:$/ do |table|
|
||||
+Then /^it should fail with the following output(, ignoring hash syntax)?:$/ do |ignore_hash_syntax, table|
|
||||
step %q(the exit status should be 1)
|
||||
lines = table.raw.flatten.reject(&:empty?)
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ if ignore_hash_syntax && RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+ lines = lines.map { |line| line.gsub(/([^\s])=>/, '\1 => ') }
|
||||
+ end
|
||||
+
|
||||
expect(all_output).to match_table(lines)
|
||||
end
|
||||
diff --git a/spec/rspec/mocks/argument_matchers_spec.rb b/spec/rspec/mocks/argument_matchers_spec.rb
|
||||
index eb101a04c..8f31d1786 100644
|
||||
--- a/spec/rspec/mocks/argument_matchers_spec.rb
|
||||
+++ b/spec/rspec/mocks/argument_matchers_spec.rb
|
||||
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ module Mocks
|
||||
expect(a_double).to receive(:random_call).with(hash_including(:a => 1))
|
||||
expect {
|
||||
a_double.random_call(:a => 2)
|
||||
- }.to fail_including "expected: (hash_including(:a=>1))"
|
||||
+ }.to fail_including "expected: (hash_including(#{hash_syntax(:a => 1)}))"
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ module Mocks
|
||||
expect(a_double).to receive(:random_call).with(hash_excluding(:a => 1))
|
||||
expect {
|
||||
a_double.random_call(:a => 1)
|
||||
- }.to fail_including "expected: (hash_not_including(:a=>1))"
|
||||
+ }.to fail_including "expected: (hash_not_including(#{hash_syntax(:a => 1)}))"
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ def ==(other)
|
||||
expect(a_double).to receive(:random_call).with(:a => "a", :b => "b")
|
||||
expect do
|
||||
a_double.random_call(opts)
|
||||
- end.to fail_with(/expected: \(\{(:a=>\"a\", :b=>\"b\"|:b=>\"b\", :a=>\"a\")\}\)/)
|
||||
+ end.to fail_with(/expected: \(\{(:a\s*=>\s*\"a\", :b\s*=>\s*\"b\"|:b\s*=>\s*\"b\", :a\s*=>\s*\"a\")\}\)/)
|
||||
end
|
||||
else
|
||||
it "matches against a hash submitted as a positional argument and received as keyword arguments in Ruby 2.7 or before" do
|
||||
@@ -445,14 +445,14 @@ def ==(other)
|
||||
expect(a_double).to receive(:random_call).with(:a => "b", :c => "d")
|
||||
expect do
|
||||
a_double.random_call(:a => "b", :c => "e")
|
||||
- end.to fail_with(/expected: \(\{(:a=>\"b\", :c=>\"d\"|:c=>\"d\", :a=>\"b\")\}\)/)
|
||||
+ end.to fail_with(/expected: \(\{(:a\s*=>\s*\"b\", :c\s*=>\s*\"d\"|:c\s*=>\s*\"d\", :a\s*=>\s*\"b\")\}\)/)
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
it "fails for a hash w/ wrong keys", :reset => true do
|
||||
expect(a_double).to receive(:random_call).with(:a => "b", :c => "d")
|
||||
expect do
|
||||
a_double.random_call("a" => "b", "c" => "d")
|
||||
- end.to fail_with(/expected: \(\{(:a=>\"b\", :c=>\"d\"|:c=>\"d\", :a=>\"b\")\}\)/)
|
||||
+ end.to fail_with(/expected: \(\{(:a\s*=>\s*\"b\", :c\s*=>\s*\"d\"|:c\s*=>\s*\"d\", :a\s*=>\s*\"b\")\}\)/)
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
it "matches a class against itself" do
|
||||
@@ -502,6 +502,10 @@ def ==(other)
|
||||
expect { a_double.msg 3 }.to fail_including "expected: (my_thing)"
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ def hash_syntax(hash)
|
||||
+ hash.inspect.gsub(/\{(.*)\}/, '\1')
|
||||
+ end
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
diff --git a/spec/rspec/mocks/diffing_spec.rb b/spec/rspec/mocks/diffing_spec.rb
|
||||
index e40fa55b6..8be6510da 100644
|
||||
--- a/spec/rspec/mocks/diffing_spec.rb
|
||||
+++ b/spec/rspec/mocks/diffing_spec.rb
|
||||
@@ -100,15 +100,18 @@
|
||||
if RSpec::Support::RubyFeatures.distincts_kw_args_from_positional_hash?
|
||||
eval <<-'RUBY', nil, __FILE__, __LINE__ + 1
|
||||
it "prints a diff when keyword argument were expected but got an option hash (using splat)" do
|
||||
+ message =
|
||||
+ "#<Double \"double\"> received :foo with unexpected arguments\n" \
|
||||
+ " expected: ({:baz=>:quz, :foo=>:bar}) (keyword arguments)\n" \
|
||||
+ " got: ({:baz=>:quz, :foo=>:bar}) (options hash)"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ message = message.gsub('=>', ' => ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+
|
||||
with_unfulfilled_double do |d|
|
||||
expect(d).to receive(:foo).with(**expected_hash)
|
||||
expect {
|
||||
d.foo(expected_hash)
|
||||
- }.to fail_with(
|
||||
- "#<Double \"double\"> received :foo with unexpected arguments\n" \
|
||||
- " expected: ({:baz=>:quz, :foo=>:bar}) (keyword arguments)\n" \
|
||||
- " got: ({:baz=>:quz, :foo=>:bar}) (options hash)"
|
||||
- )
|
||||
+ }.to fail_with(message)
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
RUBY
|
||||
@@ -117,14 +120,18 @@
|
||||
it "prints a diff when keyword argument were expected but got an option hash (literal)" do
|
||||
with_unfulfilled_double do |d|
|
||||
expect(d).to receive(:foo).with(:positional, keyword: 1)
|
||||
- expect {
|
||||
- options = { keyword: 1 }
|
||||
- d.foo(:positional, options)
|
||||
- }.to fail_with(
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ message =
|
||||
"#<Double \"double\"> received :foo with unexpected arguments\n" \
|
||||
" expected: (:positional, {:keyword=>1}) (keyword arguments)\n" \
|
||||
" got: (:positional, {:keyword=>1}) (options hash)"
|
||||
- )
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ message = message.gsub('=>',' => ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ expect {
|
||||
+ options = { keyword: 1 }
|
||||
+ d.foo(:positional, options)
|
||||
+ }.to fail_with(message)
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
RUBY
|
||||
@@ -139,10 +146,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
expect(d).to receive(:foo).with(expected_input, one: 1)
|
||||
|
||||
- expect {
|
||||
- options = { one: 1 }
|
||||
- d.foo(actual_input, options)
|
||||
- }.to fail_with(
|
||||
+ message =
|
||||
"#<Double \"double\"> received :foo with unexpected arguments\n" \
|
||||
" expected: (#{expected_input.inspect}, {:one=>1}) (keyword arguments)\n" \
|
||||
" got: (#{actual_input.inspect}, {:one=>1}) (options hash)\n" \
|
||||
@@ -150,7 +154,13 @@
|
||||
"@@ -1 +1 @@\n" \
|
||||
"-[#{expected_input.inspect}, {:one=>1}]\n" \
|
||||
"+[#{actual_input.inspect}, {:one=>1}]\n"
|
||||
- )
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ message = message.gsub('=>',' => ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ expect {
|
||||
+ options = { one: 1 }
|
||||
+ d.foo(actual_input, options)
|
||||
+ }.to fail_with(message)
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
RUBY
|
||||
@@ -172,28 +182,34 @@
|
||||
if RSpec::Support::RubyFeatures.distincts_kw_args_from_positional_hash?
|
||||
eval <<-'RUBY', nil, __FILE__, __LINE__ + 1
|
||||
it "prints a diff when keyword argument were expected but got an option hash (using splat)" do
|
||||
- expect(d).to receive(:foo).with(:positional, **expected_hash)
|
||||
- expect {
|
||||
- d.foo(:positional, expected_hash)
|
||||
- }.to fail_with(
|
||||
+ message =
|
||||
"#{d.inspect} received :foo with unexpected arguments\n" \
|
||||
" expected: (:positional, {:baz=>:quz, :foo=>:bar}) (keyword arguments)\n" \
|
||||
" got: (:positional, {:baz=>:quz, :foo=>:bar}) (options hash)"
|
||||
- )
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ message.gsub!('=>',' => ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ expect(d).to receive(:foo).with(:positional, **expected_hash)
|
||||
+ expect {
|
||||
+ d.foo(:positional, expected_hash)
|
||||
+ }.to fail_with(message)
|
||||
end
|
||||
RUBY
|
||||
|
||||
eval <<-'RUBY', nil, __FILE__, __LINE__ + 1
|
||||
it "prints a diff when keyword argument were expected but got an option hash (literal)" do
|
||||
+ message =
|
||||
+ "#{d.inspect} received :foo with unexpected arguments\n" \
|
||||
+ " expected: (:positional, {:keyword=>1}) (keyword arguments)\n" \
|
||||
+ " got: (:positional, {:keyword=>1}) (options hash)"
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ message.gsub!('=>',' => ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+
|
||||
expect(d).to receive(:foo).with(:positional, keyword: 1)
|
||||
expect {
|
||||
options = { keyword: 1 }
|
||||
d.foo(:positional, options)
|
||||
- }.to fail_with(
|
||||
- "#{d.inspect} received :foo with unexpected arguments\n" \
|
||||
- " expected: (:positional, {:keyword=>1}) (keyword arguments)\n" \
|
||||
- " got: (:positional, {:keyword=>1}) (options hash)"
|
||||
- )
|
||||
+ }.to fail_with(message)
|
||||
end
|
||||
RUBY
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -206,10 +222,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
expect(d).to receive(:foo).with(expected_input, one: 1)
|
||||
|
||||
- expect {
|
||||
- options = { one: 1 }
|
||||
- d.foo(actual_input, options)
|
||||
- }.to fail_with(
|
||||
+ message =
|
||||
"#{d.inspect} received :foo with unexpected arguments\n" \
|
||||
" expected: (#{expected_input.inspect}, {:one=>1}) (keyword arguments)\n" \
|
||||
" got: (#{actual_input.inspect}, {:one=>1}) (options hash)\n" \
|
||||
@@ -217,7 +230,13 @@
|
||||
"@@ -1 +1 @@\n" \
|
||||
"-[#{expected_input.inspect}, {:one=>1}]\n" \
|
||||
"+[#{actual_input.inspect}, {:one=>1}]\n"
|
||||
- )
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ message = message.gsub('=>', ' => ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ expect {
|
||||
+ options = { one: 1 }
|
||||
+ d.foo(actual_input, options)
|
||||
+ }.to fail_with(message)
|
||||
end
|
||||
RUBY
|
||||
end
|
||||
@@ -232,6 +251,11 @@
|
||||
def hash_regex_inspect(hash)
|
||||
"\\{(#{hash.map { |key, value| "#{key.inspect}=>#{value.inspect}.*" }.join "|"}){#{hash.size}}\\}"
|
||||
end
|
||||
+ elsif RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+ # Ruby head / 3.4 is changing the hash syntax inspect, but we use PP when diffing which just spaces out hashrockets
|
||||
+ def hash_regex_inspect(hash)
|
||||
+ Regexp.escape("{#{hash.map { |key, value| "#{key.inspect} => #{value.inspect}"}.join(", ")}}")
|
||||
+ end
|
||||
else
|
||||
def hash_regex_inspect(hash)
|
||||
Regexp.escape(hash.inspect)
|
||||
diff --git a/spec/rspec/mocks/double_spec.rb b/spec/rspec/mocks/double_spec.rb
|
||||
index d5dff63b3..ac65c590f 100644
|
||||
--- a/spec/rspec/mocks/double_spec.rb
|
||||
+++ b/spec/rspec/mocks/double_spec.rb
|
||||
@@ -526,10 +526,17 @@ def initialize(amount, units)
|
||||
|
||||
if kw_args_supported?
|
||||
it 'fails when calling yielding method with invalid kw args' do
|
||||
+ message =
|
||||
+ if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+ '#<Double "test double"> yielded |{:x => 1, :y => 2}| to block with optional keyword args (:x)'
|
||||
+ else
|
||||
+ '#<Double "test double"> yielded |{:x=>1, :y=>2}| to block with optional keyword args (:x)'
|
||||
+ end
|
||||
+
|
||||
expect(@double).to receive(:yield_back).and_yield(:x => 1, :y => 2)
|
||||
expect {
|
||||
eval("@double.yield_back { |x: 1| }")
|
||||
- }.to fail_with '#<Double "test double"> yielded |{:x=>1, :y=>2}| to block with optional keyword args (:x)'
|
||||
+ }.to fail_with message
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/spec/rspec/mocks/hash_excluding_matcher_spec.rb b/spec/rspec/mocks/hash_excluding_matcher_spec.rb
|
||||
index fc0faed05..3fca99823 100644
|
||||
--- a/spec/rspec/mocks/hash_excluding_matcher_spec.rb
|
||||
+++ b/spec/rspec/mocks/hash_excluding_matcher_spec.rb
|
||||
@@ -4,7 +4,14 @@ module ArgumentMatchers
|
||||
RSpec.describe HashExcludingMatcher do
|
||||
|
||||
it "describes itself properly" do
|
||||
- expect(HashExcludingMatcher.new(:a => 5).description).to eq "hash_not_including(:a=>5)"
|
||||
+ message =
|
||||
+ if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+ "hash_not_including(a: 5)"
|
||||
+ else
|
||||
+ "hash_not_including(:a=>5)"
|
||||
+ end
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ expect(HashExcludingMatcher.new(:a => 5).description).to eq message
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
describe "passing" do
|
||||
diff --git a/spec/rspec/mocks/hash_including_matcher_spec.rb b/spec/rspec/mocks/hash_including_matcher_spec.rb
|
||||
index ad5e8587a..057aec55d 100644
|
||||
--- a/spec/rspec/mocks/hash_including_matcher_spec.rb
|
||||
+++ b/spec/rspec/mocks/hash_including_matcher_spec.rb
|
||||
@@ -4,7 +4,14 @@ module ArgumentMatchers
|
||||
RSpec.describe HashIncludingMatcher do
|
||||
|
||||
it "describes itself properly" do
|
||||
- expect(HashIncludingMatcher.new(:a => 1).description).to eq "hash_including(:a=>1)"
|
||||
+ message =
|
||||
+ if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+ "hash_including(a: 1)"
|
||||
+ else
|
||||
+ "hash_including(:a=>1)"
|
||||
+ end
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ expect(HashIncludingMatcher.new(:a => 1).description).to eq message
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
it "describes passed matchers" do
|
||||
diff --git a/spec/rspec/mocks/matchers/receive_spec.rb b/spec/rspec/mocks/matchers/receive_spec.rb
|
||||
index 1b71dd58f..abf266935 100644
|
||||
--- a/spec/rspec/mocks/matchers/receive_spec.rb
|
||||
+++ b/spec/rspec/mocks/matchers/receive_spec.rb
|
||||
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ def kw_args_method(a:, b:); end
|
||||
dbl.kw_args_method(a: 1, b: 2)
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
- if RUBY_VERSION >= '3.0'
|
||||
+ if RUBY_VERSION.to_f >= 3.0
|
||||
it "fails to expect to receive hash with keyword args" do
|
||||
expect {
|
||||
dbl = instance_double(TestObject)
|
||||
@@ -138,9 +138,16 @@ def kw_args_method(a:, b:); end
|
||||
dbl.kw_args_method({a: 1, b: 2})
|
||||
}.to fail_with do |failure|
|
||||
reset_all
|
||||
- expect(failure.message)
|
||||
- .to include('expected: ({:a=>1, :b=>2}) (keyword arguments)')
|
||||
- .and include('got: ({:a=>1, :b=>2}) (options hash)')
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+ expect(failure.message)
|
||||
+ .to include('expected: ({:a => 1, :b => 2}) (keyword arguments)')
|
||||
+ .and include('got: ({:a => 1, :b => 2}) (options hash)')
|
||||
+ else
|
||||
+ expect(failure.message)
|
||||
+ .to include('expected: ({:a=>1, :b=>2}) (keyword arguments)')
|
||||
+ .and include('got: ({:a=>1, :b=>2}) (options hash)')
|
||||
+ end
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
else
|
||||
@@ -505,9 +512,14 @@ def receiver.method_missing(*); end # a poor man's stub...
|
||||
receiver.foo(1, :bar => 2)
|
||||
receiver.foo(1, :bar => 3)
|
||||
|
||||
- expect { verify_all }.to(
|
||||
- raise_error(/received: 2 times with arguments: \(anything, hash_including\(:bar=>"anything"\)\)$/)
|
||||
- )
|
||||
+ message =
|
||||
+ if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+ /received: 2 times with arguments: \(anything, hash_including\(bar: "anything"\)\)$/
|
||||
+ else
|
||||
+ /received: 2 times with arguments: \(anything, hash_including\(:bar=>"anything"\)\)$/
|
||||
+ end
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ expect { verify_all }.to raise_error(message)
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
diff --git a/spec/rspec/mocks/verifying_doubles/expected_arg_verification_spec.rb b/spec/rspec/mocks/verifying_doubles/expected_arg_verification_spec.rb
|
||||
index d39995341..1860afa1a 100644
|
||||
--- a/spec/rspec/mocks/verifying_doubles/expected_arg_verification_spec.rb
|
||||
+++ b/spec/rspec/mocks/verifying_doubles/expected_arg_verification_spec.rb
|
||||
@@ -130,12 +130,19 @@ module Mocks
|
||||
dbl.kw_args_method(1, :required_arg => 2, :optional_arg => 3)
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
- if RUBY_VERSION >= "3"
|
||||
+ if RUBY_VERSION.to_f >= 3.0
|
||||
it "fails to match against a hash submitted as a positional argument and received as keyword arguments in Ruby 3.0 or later", :reset => true do
|
||||
+ messages =
|
||||
+ if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+ ["expected: (1, {:optional_arg => 3, :required_arg => 2}) (keyword arguments)", "got: (1, {:optional_arg => 3, :required_arg => 2}) (options hash)"]
|
||||
+ else
|
||||
+ ["expected: (1, {:optional_arg=>3, :required_arg=>2}) (keyword arguments)", "got: (1, {:optional_arg=>3, :required_arg=>2}) (options hash)"]
|
||||
+ end
|
||||
+
|
||||
expect(dbl).to receive(:kw_args_method).with(1, :required_arg => 2, :optional_arg => 3)
|
||||
expect do
|
||||
dbl.kw_args_method(1, {:required_arg => 2, :optional_arg => 3})
|
||||
- end.to fail_with(a_string_including("expected: (1, {:optional_arg=>3, :required_arg=>2}) (keyword arguments)", "got: (1, {:optional_arg=>3, :required_arg=>2}) (options hash)"))
|
||||
+ end.to fail_with(a_string_including(*messages))
|
||||
end
|
||||
else
|
||||
it "matches against a hash submitted as a positional argument and received as keyword arguments in Ruby 2.7 or before" do
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,190 +0,0 @@
|
|||
From 9310b4b72e205c6352c4b30015a3b8f3d2fb02e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: Jon Rowe <hello@jonrowe.co.uk>
|
||||
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 11:06:37 +0000
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Format hashes in new {a: :b} format on Ruby 3.4
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
.../step_definitions/additional_cli_steps.rb | 2 +-
|
||||
.../rspec/mocks/argument_matchers_spec.rb | 24 ++++++++++++++++---
|
||||
rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/diffing_spec.rb | 17 +++++--------
|
||||
rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/double_spec.rb | 2 +-
|
||||
.../spec/rspec/mocks/matchers/receive_spec.rb | 4 ++--
|
||||
.../expected_arg_verification_spec.rb | 2 +-
|
||||
.../lib/rspec/support/object_formatter.rb | 2 ++
|
||||
.../spec/rspec/support/differ_spec.rb | 2 +-
|
||||
.../rspec/support/object_formatter_spec.rb | 22 +++++++++++++++--
|
||||
9 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/rspec-mocks/features/step_definitions/additional_cli_steps.rb b/rspec-mocks/features/step_definitions/additional_cli_steps.rb
|
||||
index acf1117e0..9ccfac5b1 100644
|
||||
--- a/rspec-mocks/features/step_definitions/additional_cli_steps.rb
|
||||
+++ b/rspec-mocks/features/step_definitions/additional_cli_steps.rb
|
||||
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
|
||||
lines = table.raw.flatten.reject(&:empty?)
|
||||
|
||||
if ignore_hash_syntax && RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
- lines = lines.map { |line| line.gsub(/([^\s])=>/, '\1 => ') }
|
||||
+ lines = lines.map { |line| line.gsub(/:(\w+)=>/, '\1: ') }
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
expect(all_output).to match_table(lines)
|
||||
diff --git a/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/argument_matchers_spec.rb b/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/argument_matchers_spec.rb
|
||||
index 8f31d1786..4bffa727d 100644
|
||||
--- a/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/argument_matchers_spec.rb
|
||||
+++ b/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/argument_matchers_spec.rb
|
||||
@@ -431,7 +431,13 @@ def ==(other)
|
||||
expect(a_double).to receive(:random_call).with(:a => "a", :b => "b")
|
||||
expect do
|
||||
a_double.random_call(opts)
|
||||
- end.to fail_with(/expected: \(\{(:a\s*=>\s*\"a\", :b\s*=>\s*\"b\"|:b\s*=>\s*\"b\", :a\s*=>\s*\"a\")\}\)/)
|
||||
+ end.to fail_with(
|
||||
+ if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+ /expected: \(\{a: \"a\", b: \"b\"\}\)/
|
||||
+ else
|
||||
+ /expected: \(\{(:a\s*=>\s*\"a\", :b\s*=>\s*\"b\"|:b\s*=>\s*\"b\", :a\s*=>\s*\"a\")\}\)/
|
||||
+ end
|
||||
+ )
|
||||
end
|
||||
else
|
||||
it "matches against a hash submitted as a positional argument and received as keyword arguments in Ruby 2.7 or before" do
|
||||
@@ -445,14 +451,26 @@ def ==(other)
|
||||
expect(a_double).to receive(:random_call).with(:a => "b", :c => "d")
|
||||
expect do
|
||||
a_double.random_call(:a => "b", :c => "e")
|
||||
- end.to fail_with(/expected: \(\{(:a\s*=>\s*\"b\", :c\s*=>\s*\"d\"|:c\s*=>\s*\"d\", :a\s*=>\s*\"b\")\}\)/)
|
||||
+ end.to fail_with(
|
||||
+ if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+ /expected: \(\{a: \"b\", c: \"d\"\}\)/
|
||||
+ else
|
||||
+ /expected: \(\{(:a\s*=>\s*\"b\", :c\s*=>\s*\"d\"|:c\s*=>\s*\"d\", :a\s*=>\s*\"b\")\}\)/
|
||||
+ end
|
||||
+ )
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
it "fails for a hash w/ wrong keys", :reset => true do
|
||||
expect(a_double).to receive(:random_call).with(:a => "b", :c => "d")
|
||||
expect do
|
||||
a_double.random_call("a" => "b", "c" => "d")
|
||||
- end.to fail_with(/expected: \(\{(:a\s*=>\s*\"b\", :c\s*=>\s*\"d\"|:c\s*=>\s*\"d\", :a\s*=>\s*\"b\")\}\)/)
|
||||
+ end.to fail_with(
|
||||
+ if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+ /expected: \(\{a: \"b\", c: \"d\"\}\)/
|
||||
+ else
|
||||
+ /expected: \(\{(:a\s*=>\s*\"b\", :c\s*=>\s*\"d\"|:c\s*=>\s*\"d\", :a\s*=>\s*\"b\")\}\)/
|
||||
+ end
|
||||
+ )
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
it "matches a class against itself" do
|
||||
diff --git a/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/diffing_spec.rb b/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/diffing_spec.rb
|
||||
index f071cc1ec..b4492b4e8 100644
|
||||
--- a/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/diffing_spec.rb
|
||||
+++ b/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/diffing_spec.rb
|
||||
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
|
||||
" expected: ({:baz=>:quz, :foo=>:bar}) (keyword arguments)\n" \
|
||||
" got: ({:baz=>:quz, :foo=>:bar}) (options hash)"
|
||||
|
||||
- message = message.gsub('=>', ' => ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+ message = message.gsub(/:(\w+)=>/, '\1: ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
|
||||
with_unfulfilled_double do |d|
|
||||
expect(d).to receive(:foo).with(**expected_hash)
|
||||
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
|
||||
" expected: (:positional, {:keyword=>1}) (keyword arguments)\n" \
|
||||
" got: (:positional, {:keyword=>1}) (options hash)"
|
||||
|
||||
- message = message.gsub('=>',' => ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+ message = message.gsub(/:(\w+)=>/, '\1: ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
|
||||
expect {
|
||||
options = { keyword: 1 }
|
||||
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
|
||||
"-[#{expected_input.inspect}, {:one=>1}]\n" \
|
||||
"+[#{actual_input.inspect}, {:one=>1}]\n"
|
||||
|
||||
- message = message.gsub('=>',' => ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+ message = message.gsub(/:(\w+)=>/, '\1: ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
|
||||
expect {
|
||||
options = { one: 1 }
|
||||
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@
|
||||
" expected: (:positional, {:baz=>:quz, :foo=>:bar}) (keyword arguments)\n" \
|
||||
" got: (:positional, {:baz=>:quz, :foo=>:bar}) (options hash)"
|
||||
|
||||
- message.gsub!('=>',' => ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+ message = message.gsub(/:(\w+)=>/, '\1: ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
|
||||
expect(d).to receive(:foo).with(:positional, **expected_hash)
|
||||
expect {
|
||||
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@
|
||||
" expected: (:positional, {:keyword=>1}) (keyword arguments)\n" \
|
||||
" got: (:positional, {:keyword=>1}) (options hash)"
|
||||
|
||||
- message.gsub!('=>',' => ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+ message = message.gsub(/:(\w+)=>/, '\1: ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
|
||||
expect(d).to receive(:foo).with(:positional, keyword: 1)
|
||||
expect {
|
||||
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@
|
||||
"-[#{expected_input.inspect}, {:one=>1}]\n" \
|
||||
"+[#{actual_input.inspect}, {:one=>1}]\n"
|
||||
|
||||
- message = message.gsub('=>', ' => ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
+ message = message.gsub(/:(\w+)=>/, '\1: ') if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
|
||||
expect {
|
||||
options = { one: 1 }
|
||||
@@ -251,11 +251,6 @@
|
||||
def hash_regex_inspect(hash)
|
||||
"\\{(#{hash.map { |key, value| "#{key.inspect}=>#{value.inspect}.*" }.join "|"}){#{hash.size}}\\}"
|
||||
end
|
||||
- elsif RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
- # Ruby head / 3.4 is changing the hash syntax inspect, but we use PP when diffing which just spaces out hashrockets
|
||||
- def hash_regex_inspect(hash)
|
||||
- Regexp.escape("{#{hash.map { |key, value| "#{key.inspect} => #{value.inspect}"}.join(", ")}}")
|
||||
- end
|
||||
else
|
||||
def hash_regex_inspect(hash)
|
||||
Regexp.escape(hash.inspect)
|
||||
diff --git a/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/double_spec.rb b/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/double_spec.rb
|
||||
index ac65c590f..9738edfa7 100644
|
||||
--- a/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/double_spec.rb
|
||||
+++ b/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/double_spec.rb
|
||||
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ def initialize(amount, units)
|
||||
it 'fails when calling yielding method with invalid kw args' do
|
||||
message =
|
||||
if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
- '#<Double "test double"> yielded |{:x => 1, :y => 2}| to block with optional keyword args (:x)'
|
||||
+ '#<Double "test double"> yielded |{x: 1, y: 2}| to block with optional keyword args (:x)'
|
||||
else
|
||||
'#<Double "test double"> yielded |{:x=>1, :y=>2}| to block with optional keyword args (:x)'
|
||||
end
|
||||
diff --git a/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/matchers/receive_spec.rb b/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/matchers/receive_spec.rb
|
||||
index 3e71bd289..307c86a6f 100644
|
||||
--- a/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/matchers/receive_spec.rb
|
||||
+++ b/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/matchers/receive_spec.rb
|
||||
@@ -141,8 +141,8 @@ def kw_args_method(a:, b:); end
|
||||
|
||||
if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
expect(failure.message)
|
||||
- .to include('expected: ({:a => 1, :b => 2}) (keyword arguments)')
|
||||
- .and include('got: ({:a => 1, :b => 2}) (options hash)')
|
||||
+ .to include('expected: ({a: 1, b: 2}) (keyword arguments)')
|
||||
+ .and include('got: ({a: 1, b: 2}) (options hash)')
|
||||
else
|
||||
expect(failure.message)
|
||||
.to include('expected: ({:a=>1, :b=>2}) (keyword arguments)')
|
||||
diff --git a/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/verifying_doubles/expected_arg_verification_spec.rb b/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/verifying_doubles/expected_arg_verification_spec.rb
|
||||
index a3f3d2034..48646a1e6 100644
|
||||
--- a/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/verifying_doubles/expected_arg_verification_spec.rb
|
||||
+++ b/rspec-mocks/spec/rspec/mocks/verifying_doubles/expected_arg_verification_spec.rb
|
||||
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ module Mocks
|
||||
it "fails to match against a hash submitted as a positional argument and received as keyword arguments in Ruby 3.0 or later", :reset => true do
|
||||
messages =
|
||||
if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3.3
|
||||
- ["expected: (1, {:optional_arg => 3, :required_arg => 2}) (keyword arguments)", "got: (1, {:optional_arg => 3, :required_arg => 2}) (options hash)"]
|
||||
+ ["expected: (1, {optional_arg: 3, required_arg: 2}) (keyword arguments)", "got: (1, {optional_arg: 3, required_arg: 2}) (options hash)"]
|
||||
else
|
||||
["expected: (1, {:optional_arg=>3, :required_arg=>2}) (keyword arguments)", "got: (1, {:optional_arg=>3, :required_arg=>2}) (options hash)"]
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
|
|||
From 939c4799993b7ff7e524fac701ae6490772ca6de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: Jon Rowe <hello@jonrowe.co.uk>
|
||||
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 14:08:25 +0000
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] Skip mock for calls to `:respond_to?` from `Kernel#inspect`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
rspec-mocks/lib/rspec/mocks/method_double.rb | 15 +++++++++++++--
|
||||
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/rspec-mocks/lib/rspec/mocks/method_double.rb b/rspec-mocks/lib/rspec/mocks/method_double.rb
|
||||
index e2edb1e21..3276c49a5 100644
|
||||
--- a/rspec-mocks/lib/rspec/mocks/method_double.rb
|
||||
+++ b/rspec-mocks/lib/rspec/mocks/method_double.rb
|
||||
@@ -68,8 +68,19 @@ def define_proxy_method
|
||||
|
||||
save_original_implementation_callable!
|
||||
definition_target.class_exec(self, method_name, @original_visibility || visibility) do |method_double, method_name, visibility|
|
||||
- define_method(method_name) do |*args, &block|
|
||||
- method_double.proxy_method_invoked(self, *args, &block)
|
||||
+ if RUBY_VERSION.to_f > 3 && method_name == :respond_to?
|
||||
+ define_method(method_name) do |*args, &block|
|
||||
+ # This is a work around for a respond_to? check within kernel_inspect
|
||||
+ if caller_locations[0].label == "Kernel#inspect"
|
||||
+ super(*args, &block)
|
||||
+ else
|
||||
+ method_double.proxy_method_invoked(self, *args, &block)
|
||||
+ end
|
||||
+ end
|
||||
+ else
|
||||
+ define_method(method_name) do |*args, &block|
|
||||
+ method_double.proxy_method_invoked(self, *args, &block)
|
||||
+ end
|
||||
end
|
||||
# This can't be `if respond_to?(:ruby2_keywords, true)`,
|
||||
# see https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/pull/1385#issuecomment-755340298
|
||||
|
|
@ -14,9 +14,10 @@ CURRDIR=$(pwd)
|
|||
TMPDIRPATH=$(mktemp -d /var/tmp/rspec-tar-XXXXXX)
|
||||
pushd $TMPDIRPATH
|
||||
|
||||
git clone https://github.com/rspec/rspec.git
|
||||
pushd rspec
|
||||
git reset --hard $1-v$2
|
||||
git clone https://github.com/rspec/$1.git
|
||||
pushd $1
|
||||
git reset --hard v$2
|
||||
popd
|
||||
|
||||
ln -sf $1 $1-$2
|
||||
tar czf ${CURRDIR}/rubygem-$1-$2-full.tar.gz $1-$2/./
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
|
|||
%global majorver 3.13.7
|
||||
%global majorver 3.13.2
|
||||
#%%global preminorver .rc6
|
||||
%global rpmminorver .%(echo %preminorver | sed -e 's|^\\.\\.*||')
|
||||
%global fullver %{majorver}%{?preminorver}
|
||||
|
||||
%global baserelease 2
|
||||
%global baserelease 1
|
||||
|
||||
%global gem_name rspec-mocks
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -18,14 +18,11 @@ Release: %{?preminorver:0.}%{baserelease}%{?preminorver:%{rpmminorver}}%{?dist}
|
|||
|
||||
# SPDX confirmed
|
||||
License: MIT
|
||||
URL: https://rspec.info
|
||||
URL: http://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks
|
||||
Source0: https://rubygems.org/gems/%{gem_name}-%{fullver}.gem
|
||||
# %%{SOURCE2} %%{name} %%{version}
|
||||
Source1: rubygem-%{gem_name}-%{version}-full.tar.gz
|
||||
Source2: rspec-related-create-full-tarball.sh
|
||||
# https://github.com/rspec/rspec/pull/282/commits/939c4799993b7ff7e524fac701ae6490772ca6de
|
||||
# Skip mock for ruby4_0 Kernel#inspect
|
||||
Patch0: rspec-mocks-pr282-skip-mock-for-ruby4_0-inspect.patch
|
||||
|
||||
BuildRequires: rubygems-devel
|
||||
%if %{without bootstrap}
|
||||
|
|
@ -58,7 +55,6 @@ This package contains documentation for %{name}.
|
|||
gem unpack %{SOURCE0}
|
||||
|
||||
%setup -q -D -T -n %{gem_name}-%{version} -b 1
|
||||
%patch -P0 -p2
|
||||
|
||||
# Cucumber 7 syntax change
|
||||
sed -i cucumber.yml -e "s|~@wip|not @wip|"
|
||||
|
|
@ -122,33 +118,6 @@ cucumber
|
|||
%{gem_docdir}
|
||||
|
||||
%changelog
|
||||
* Tue Dec 02 2025 Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@fedoraproject.org> - 3.13.7-2
|
||||
- Backport upstream patch to skip mock for Kernel#inspect on ruby4_0
|
||||
|
||||
* Mon Nov 24 2025 Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@fedoraproject.org> - 3.13.7-1
|
||||
- 3.13.7
|
||||
|
||||
* Fri Oct 17 2025 Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@fedoraproject.org> - 3.13.6-1
|
||||
- 3.13.6
|
||||
|
||||
* Fri Jul 25 2025 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@fedoraproject.org> - 3.13.5-2
|
||||
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_43_Mass_Rebuild
|
||||
|
||||
* Thu May 29 2025 Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@fedoraproject.org> - 3.13.5-1
|
||||
- 3.13.5
|
||||
|
||||
* Thu May 15 2025 Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@fedoraproject.org> - 3.13.4-1
|
||||
- 3.13.4
|
||||
|
||||
* Sat Jan 18 2025 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@fedoraproject.org> - 3.13.2-4
|
||||
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_42_Mass_Rebuild
|
||||
|
||||
* Sun Dec 29 2024 Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@fedoraproject.org> - 3.13.2-3
|
||||
- Coordinate with rspec-support change wrt ruby34 hash inspect support
|
||||
|
||||
* Wed Nov 06 2024 Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@fedoraproject.org> - 3.13.2-2
|
||||
- Backport upstream patch to support ruby34 formatting
|
||||
|
||||
* Thu Oct 03 2024 Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@fedoraproject.org> - 3.13.2-1
|
||||
- 3.13.2
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
4
sources
4
sources
|
|
@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
|
|||
SHA512 (rspec-mocks-3.13.7.gem) = fa30824f1d7ab82e2c0d1cde1f076cb84b9a9e1e9e7292e33bcfda934468a50f2b59a1dc539137be14ad5b86465ed6fa12c32af2e3a79992c3ce5d278072861c
|
||||
SHA512 (rubygem-rspec-mocks-3.13.7-full.tar.gz) = 7666b07e6b9806e36d53ede810c6efc0ceb57bc554c96e0fdf44efbfd9dd027a8e999ce942d20bf46f93f93bfae1a88c7ffd0bfbf2cdf08601093a98218a059a
|
||||
SHA512 (rspec-mocks-3.13.2.gem) = 3284411d5f9c3b10aca0ca41bfeec4ec423b1d2effb1942a36ff61c741ff8b1281ae69d46086881f99fc3e70522cf6a31805e980fe270e35cc35c6d8376c9152
|
||||
SHA512 (rubygem-rspec-mocks-3.13.2-full.tar.gz) = 79a22d5356247e4d563868589f512018f51a235aafa9d001d81673c73bc1d0a04be7c4770518744f77dfb4e7f726b5c037384a5f14cd853202466b68e4398e9c
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue