use epel/epel instead of distribution/epel library

The README on

  https://github.com/beakerlib/distribution/tree/master/epel

states that

  This is a compatibility layer to overcome a transitional
  phase from distribution/epel to epel/epel.

So use epel/epel instead.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Jaburek <jjaburek@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jiri Jaburek 2026-05-12 13:09:29 +02:00 committed by mmalik
commit affc7c2cfc
3 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View file

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ component:
- kernel
framework: beakerlib
require:
- library(distribution/epel)
- library(epel/epel)
- /usr/bin/nc
- perf
- git

View file

@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ if [ $(nproc) -lt 64 ]; then
rlPhaseEnd
else
rlPhaseStartSetup
rlImport "distribution/epel"
rlImport "epel/epel"
rlRun "command -v hping3 || epelyum install -y hping3" 0 \
"Make sure hping3 is installed (EPEL-only on RHEL)"

View file

@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ $(METADATA): Makefile
@echo "Requires: yum-utils" >> $(METADATA)
@echo "Requires: python3 sqlite" >> $(METADATA)
@echo "Provides: library(selinux-policy/common)" >> $(METADATA)
@echo "RhtsRequires: library(distribution/epel)" >> $(METADATA)
@echo "RhtsRequires: library(epel/epel)" >> $(METADATA)
@echo "License: GPLv2" >> $(METADATA)
@echo "Destructive: no" >> $(METADATA)
@echo "Environment: AVC_ERROR=+no_avc_check" >> $(METADATA)